SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (861341)6/1/2015 8:55:49 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1576979
 
If what you and certain economists are saying were true, the participation rate should be moving up esp in metros where the unemployment rates are dropping below 4 and 5%. Instead, labor shortages are developing in the most robust industries:

Bah! Mere facts! What are facts in the face of ungrounded speculation?

Tim doesn't need facts. They get in the way of his theories.



To: tejek who wrote (861341)6/5/2015 9:26:40 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576979
 
Apparently it accounts for much more than that

No, it doesn't.

because there is very little change in the participation rate even as unemployment drops below 5% in many metros.

There was significant change in the participation rate, not "very little". I guess you could cherry pick some area where it hasn't change much, but you don't even do that, you show no local data for the participation rate anywhere.