SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (861539)6/1/2015 1:22:00 PM
From: i-node3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB
gamesmistress

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578501
 
The survey you cited represents something of a half truth. Yes, the median age is 24; but it is easy to see that most of these workers are kids. It is clear that the mode is around 16 or 18 and the second highest counts are found still in the teens.

More importantly, 79% of the age 16-24 minimum wage earners are part-time workers with an average family income of $66,000. 22% of them live in families that are at or below the poverty line, and 68% are above 150% of the poverty line.

Only 3% of these workers have a college degree and 34% did not finish high school.

The bottom line is that you are here spreading the usual liberal manure. Yes, some of these people are poor whose work is not of sufficient value to warrant higher pay. These are the very people whose jobs will be lost when the minimum wage is raised.





To: combjelly who wrote (861539)6/1/2015 3:31:53 PM
From: Bill2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
jlallen

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578501
 
You are always wrong, combover. What major leaguer wouldn't give his soul for your batting average.



To: combjelly who wrote (861539)6/2/2015 7:39:37 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1578501
 
Correct.....YOU are wrong as usual, Weiner boy.....