Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Dior who wrote (3256)	12/19/1997 2:57:00 PM
From: jkb	Respond to of 6980

Kind of reminds me recently when QNTM was at 30 - everyone was thinking it was going to be an easy ride back to 35. Then some trader decided to short the stock with a transaction value of $3 million. That was about a month ago - QNTM now at $19. We'll see. -Jay

To: Ron Dior who wrote (3256)	12/19/1997 3:08:00 PM
From: rupert1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

RON: Do not place too much credence on the 100,000 purchase. I personally have made more than one such purchase of BAY in the last twelve months. I did not know anything special. I was badly wrong on the timing. In fact I lost a great deal of money on my first purchase. I made some of it back when the stock tanked, I had sold near the bottom because of margin problems but bought more than 100,000 again. If you look at the Dr. House purchase of 100,000 shares earlier this year, he paid about 21.75. He, exulted when it went to 41 plus and bought again in the 30's. He is now just a point or two above what he paid for the original purchase. It may or may not comfort you to know that I am long BAY again, but also nervous about the volitility until earnings. I am confident of earnings and will feel cheated if they do not meet, and slightly cheated if they do not surprise on the upside. Vepoc