SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Graham Osborn who wrote (55396)6/2/2015 5:57:22 PM
From: E_K_S  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78744
 
Re: Graham Valuation and the Graham No.

This has been my one best valuation metrics in the last two years. I was surprised to see the undervalued Graham valuations for some of the reinsurers I follow specifically Baldwin & Lyons Inc. (NASDAQ: BWINB) and Maiden Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: MHLD).

I do not have a lot of experience evaluating these reinsurers and do not know if the Graham No. valuation has a hidden flaw when using the mathematical valuation calculation. I have linked the two name to the Google Graham No. valuation spreadsheet I use and you can see they both show that they are selling below 40% of their Graham No. fair value.

Have you looked at the sector in general and specifically BWINB and/or MHLD?

Neither of the companies have 10 years of positive EPS so one could exclude them from the GN calculation based on that criteria but BWINB did have 8 positive EPS years. The two that were negative were due to one time insurance claims paid that impacted the current years reserves. Maybe if one smooths out the EPS and increase in BV/Assets over 10 years, it better accounts for the insurance premiums collected vs paid out.

After my review of these companies and the sector in general, it's pretty easy to evaluate assets and cash flows from the insurance premiums but more difficult to quantify the risk level of the company's future insurance liability for customer policies written.

Since W. Buffet did so well with Geico, I wanted to give it another look before I excluded this sector from my candidate buy list.

EKS



To: Graham Osborn who wrote (55396)6/3/2015 4:05:37 AM
From: MNTNH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78744
 
Hi Graham, do you mean Chinese companies only or anything/ other parameters?

My 1 cents worth is that US is fairly pricey at the moment, and all of my current 5 holdings are outside of US, specifically in Asia. However I am in the midst of looking at a couple of US listed companies and all small-mid caps.

My approach is more on the concentrated side. I dont discriminate securities other than by their risk and return profiles. Besides, things are always much more correlated than it seems on the surface, as arbitrageurs would have learnt over the years.