SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (863914)6/9/2015 5:33:12 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579772
 
It isn't my idea, Taro. But the consensus of the majority of scientists. The counter-evidence is, at best, thin. Despite your trolling of fringe science.

The fact that it may have been warmer in the past makes no difference. We didn't evolve in such a regime. Nor did any of the biota we depend on. If your point is that life can exist when it is warmer that isn't in dispute. I just want to point out that said ecologies don't have to include humans.



To: Taro who wrote (863914)6/9/2015 6:01:31 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1579772
 
" there is absolutely no evidence anywhere to support your idea, that rises in CO2 levels cause glaobal warming."

Here's a lot

ipcc.ch

" A lot of evidence to the contrary, however. "
None whatsoever.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News