To: tejek who wrote (865131 ) 6/13/2015 3:51:05 PM From: Brumar89 1 RecommendationRecommended By FJB
Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575311 What its saying is that blue cities are creating jobs that require people to be educated with good job skills. Ergo, many of the minorities moving to the South are those that are the least educated and without job skills. Blue cities that aren't all black don't want blacks. They pursue policies to encourage them to get out. the South continually produces low paying jobs that don't require much education and job skills. This is not something of which to be proud. Actually all jobs are good ... people trying to climb the socioeconomic ladder needs jobs that you put down to help them move up. BTW why are Aligheri and bentway and Weiner boy all in the south? Are they losers?Blue cities have a long tradition of progress and expansion. Blue cities like Chicago and Detroit are the exception; not the rule. Much more typical are cities like MPLS, St Paul, Madison, SFO, Grand Rapids, San Jose, Columbus, Portland, Seattle, Boston etc. You're listing a handful of white blue cities. Chicago and Detroit are not rare exceptions, they're typical of black Democratic run cities.....southern cities simply grow their populations and that's just about it. There are exceptions of course.........Nashville, Charlotte, Austin, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas and Raleigh Durham.....are pretty dynamic . You just listed as exceptions most of the large cities in the south. What are the largest cities in the south .. the ones you listed as exceptions.As for Detroit and some of the other rust belt cities, slowly but surely, they are starting to improve. It will be decades before they are viable again........but the worst is definitely over for them. I don't think they've hit bottom. They're going to get worse and you can blame the Obama crime wave for that.