Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CantwaitforPEA who wrote (960)	6/13/2015 5:28:58 PM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By techsupport Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Its a reasonable request, the problem is, ZEN leaves out critical info on almost every NR, which leads one to speculate as to why do it? For instance, why leave out the bottom number "upto 92.5%" other then you do not want people to know it? See what I mean? If you do not want anyone to know it, its generally because its not a good number. The recovery of 75% now supports that theory. So speculating that the lower number was not released because it was a lousy number now has merit, doesn't it? The other thing that ZEN does that is very irritating is they do not break down what the purity is based on, a single flake size or the entire sample? What that means is ZEN could consistently report one flake size, we will say 40 micron. Everytime its tested its 99.9%+ but the 30micron flake is not reported which may be 95% So there are things that are left out that makes a person suspicious.