To: gronieel2 who wrote (865450 ) 6/15/2015 1:12:23 PM From: Brumar89 1 RecommendationRecommended By POKERSAM
Respond to of 1577883 Leftists Demand Firing of Asian Conservative College Paper Editor for “Unsafe” Views June 15, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield It occurs to me that the people who constantly demand safe spaces are the ones making places unsafe for everyone else. Duke student Jonathan Zhao wrote a column on “The Plight of the Black Community” for the Duke Chronicle. It was politically incorrect, but these days what isn’t, in that it noted problems such as single parenthood and welfare dependency and suggested those were the real issues.[iframe name="aswift_0" width="300" height="250" id="aswift_0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowtransparency="true"][/iframe] Lastly, and perhaps paramount to all other cultural issues, is the pervasive sense of crippling victimhood within the black community. Leaders of the black community, whether nationally like Al Sharpton or locally like the People of Color Caucus, ply the poisonous snake oil of victimhood to blacks, blaming problems on past injustice and racism. While racism certainly exists and past injustices like slavery were undoubtedly evil and a blight on American history, using those two excuses as a crutch keeps the black community stuck in the past and prevents it from moving forward in a constructive manner. As John H. McWhorter, a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute who also happens to be black, argues, “the ideology of victimhood… rather than what remains of racism itself, is the biggest obstacle to further black progress in today’s America.” So the crippling victimhood lobby spoke up and demanded that Zhao be silenced. “[W]e do not believe students have a protected right to use a student publication meant to serve and represent the Duke community as a platform to proliferate racist stereotypes and misinformation about an entire group of people – a group of people to which the writer does not even belong,” stated the petition, written by a group calling themselves “Concerned and Conscious Duke Students.” The Constitution and the Supreme Court disagree, but if Hillary gets a few more appointees in there, that will change.“We are concerned that if Zhao continues as an editor of the opinion column, he will also continue to abuse his position of power to create an unsafe educational environment for marginalized students,” it states. “This is not a question of being ‘politically correct,’ nor is it a matter of censorship. Rather, this is a call to hold The Chronicle’s staff and the content they produce to a higher standard of journalistic ethics.” It’s not politically correct censorship. It’s just a demand that an editor be censored for his political views.frontpagemag.com