Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (866221)	6/18/2015 11:09:48 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1578144

What we know about suspect Dylann Storm Roof, Psych Drugs]

To: Sdgla who wrote (866221)	6/19/2015 11:03:19 AM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By POKERSAM Respond to of 1578144

Belgian Doctors Are Euthanizing Patients Without Their Consent ................................................................................................................ Cybercast News Service ^ \| June 18, 2015 \| 3:05 PM EDT \| Abigail Wilkinson

To: Sdgla who wrote (866221)	6/19/2015 1:01:36 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578144

Wiggle wiggle. Squirm, squirm. Now we are arguing over semantics. While you didn't use the word "exactly", you implied it. Else your statement makes no sense. If a given mass of ice melts, but a lesser mass of water freezes, then you have a net increase in the amount of water. If the melted ice is on land, then you have a rise in sea level. Period. Full stop. And that is exactly what is being measured. Despite all of your handwaving and fan dancing. So, where is your proof that floating ice can affect sea level when it melts or freezes? Or are you just going to keep on refusing to man up that you made a mistake? My money is on the latter.