Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (182374)	6/19/2015 12:17:37 PM
From: weatherguru	1 Recommendation Recommended By isopatch Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Of course. It's constantly adjusted. Link is the 1997 global analysis summary from NOAA/NCDC. ncdc.noaa.gov "The global average temperature of 62.45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1997 was the warmest year on record, surpassing the previous record set in 1995 by 0.15 degrees Fahrenheit." Geez. They are a broken record. Fast-forward to 2014. ncdc.noaa.gov "The year 2014 was the warmest year across global land and ocean surfaces since records began in 1880. The annually-averaged temperature was 0.69°C (1.24°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F), easily breaking the previous records of 2005 and 2010 by 0.04°C (0.07°F)." Lets do some math. 57.0F+1.24F = 58.24F. How is this warmer than 62.45F in 1997? Easy, NOAA/NCDC has cooled 1997 by several degrees.