Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bills16 who wrote (1212)	6/19/2015 2:55:23 PM
From: hoov	Respond to of 22811

Bills, you're reading things into my remarks that I did not say. And, you're not reading what I do say. I'm not claiming ignorance at all. Whatever. Lar

To: Bills16 who wrote (1212)	6/19/2015 4:14:32 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Love it! You seem to like to post inferences and then claim ignorance when questioned. Are you sure you're not my ex in disguise? :)You suggested it was advantageous for AE to stay running this company as, "Aubrey paid a fraction of a cent per share. Meanwhile, he's getting a large salary, and travel expenses, etc." I was simply stating that your logic escapes myself. If AE wanted the cash, he could have sold his shares at $4, made 4x his yearly salary in investments on the interest alone and started a new company. Obviously he didn't sell at $4 for a reason and it will be interesting to see his reasoning. I think he still believed it would be "cheap and easy". So far, its not been easy, and, based on what I think his final sell price per ton is, it won't be cheap either.