SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (867196)6/23/2015 1:34:12 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1577147
 
>> Not my idea. I think it makes good sense.

It is f*cking stupid.



To: combjelly who wrote (867196)6/23/2015 1:50:59 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577147
 
CJ,
Not my idea. I think it makes good sense.
For lawyers, that is.

What's the insurance for? If the gun just go off on its own? If the gun happens to jam or explode in the hands of its wielder?

There is no such thing as insurance against assh---s who will use guns to do whatever. I'm all for tighter regulations on firearms, but this isn't it.

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (867196)6/25/2015 12:19:19 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577147
 
Me too....

If we're required to have insurance on our cars then why not on our guns?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News