SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (868165)6/26/2015 1:45:16 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1582533
 
Eric,
Taxes - if not for that - there would be no reason.
How about making sure all of the vehicles on the road are compliant with safety and environmental standards?

How about making it impossible for thieves to steal cars without taking them to chop shops?

How about driver's licenses? Just for taxes as well?
That is the answer - the government has been barred from restricting that right.
Without a stronger defense than that, the only way the 2nd amendment can be protected from repeal is by spreading FUD about the dangers thereof.

Tenchusatsu



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (868165)6/26/2015 2:53:25 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1582533
 
I'm assuming you think a database will reduce crime?
Can you explain how that would work?
There are fewer people than guns in the USA - wouldn't it be easier to track crazy people?


.....we've been thru this with him before.....he could not explain it then and won't be able to now....or ever......I like your idea of registering and tracking "crazy people"



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (868165)6/26/2015 3:57:21 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1582533
 
>>wouldn't it be easier to track crazy people?<<

For me, that category would include any Republican.