SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : GOLD-XAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (755)12/20/1997 12:14:00 AM
From: Richnorth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1756
 
The trouble is that any rise in the price of gold has been countered by central banks selling or threats to sell gold. The reasons for CB selling gold are too well known. By the way, CB sales do not necessarily have to be in physical gold. They may involve paper claims on gold.

Demand for gold for jewellery outstrips mine production of gold. The shortfall is made up for by gold actually sold by CBs or by shorters and other hedgers.

BTW, Wayne Angell (sp?), a former Fed governor said on Tuesday (reported in WSJ) that he expected gold to bottom out at about $260 in the first half of 1998. But experts have often been known to be terribly mistaken. But then again, he might turn out to be right: after all, a stopped clock is accurate at least twice a day!



To: Don Green who wrote (755)12/20/1997 2:16:00 AM
From: paul ross  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1756
 
Don-

Supply is the issue, I would have to agree with Reedÿin post 753. A once in a lifetime sale of gold (& lending) by the CB's.

Please review 49'ers post of the Peter Lynch article-
talk.teckstocks.com

And the Frank Veneroso conference call, a series of 3 posts from the Gold Price Monitor thread-
Message 3005473

PR