Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (8233)	12/20/1997 2:14:00 PM
From: Feline	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

No, I was waiting for the death dip to 80 cents. I'm only asking what the resource would be if the cut-off were raised to about 25 g/tn Ag ($4.80 per tonne?) Would it significantly change the resource? I got wet on a few other stocks, some of which are now lower than what I paid.

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (8233)	12/20/1997 2:28:00 PM
From: rdww	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

it makes more sense to build a mine / reserve on something ( al lower cut-off) that should stay profitable. So while Feline may ask rascally questions - I'm sure there's a reason. Instead of raising the bar to meet the 13 yr high Silver price use a # that will results in a mine being started. I would figger that a good feas + production date are 1-2 yrs out. So what will the Ag price be then? Stick w/ the lower #'s or ask for ranges. When production starts up - it's easy then to start pumping more thru then it is to say oops (or say Pegasus)