Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (7555)	12/20/1997 9:54:00 AM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

I have heard from fairly good authority that the SEC is watching these gold stocks..including the internet forums dedicated to them. I would hope that someone did talk to liontamer about his posts.. for onc..probably was based on insider information..and 2..what he was saying was actually very damaging IMO..He presented himself as someone who had inside info..then made comments like"the results will be out by 5 today..if not..ledoux is refusing to release them" of course..it wasnt released then..and of course..ledoux did indeed release them later..but his posts worried me more than any that Hungry Lion posted..I want more information,just like everyone else.. but i want it done so as not to subject Naxos to any more trouble. with the huge numbers that naxos has just put out..they are watching their Ps&Qs..so well thought out and not to be construed as hype info..great.. loose cannon investors with inside info..no thanks.. i prefer naxos not get halted, myself..<<<of course, if liontamer would like to email me with any pertinent info..well i'll make an exception to that <VBG>>>

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (7555)	12/20/1997 10:49:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Respond to of 20681

Mr. Van Hummel; You posted: "You DID refer to the past weekly reports and wondered when we would have such flow of information again. THAT is what I referred to." We have no disagreement here. I believe it was Mr. Reschner who gave the erroneous spin when I just asked if anyone remembered those days. I never intended to communicate a desire to return to them. He posted; exchange2000.com where he said, "I wholeheartedly support your suggestion that Naxos resume the weekly updates by the Chief Operating Officer." Mr. Reschner may have misconstrued my intent and may have substituted his own. Thank you for the opportunity to clear up that one issue and for your agreement on the other points which I raised. Jerard P