SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BeanCounter who wrote (29393)12/20/1997 10:18:00 AM
From: go4it  Respond to of 35569
 
Michael,

Your statement sounds very absurd. Do you have any evidence to back this up or at least thoughts why you believe this to be true ?



To: BeanCounter who wrote (29393)12/20/1997 10:19:00 AM
From: Anne Lamb  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
oh good..IPM has one good day and the vultures with no life come
running back..gonna make SURE that no one here breathes one sigh
of relief..
any eejit that thinks that IPM would intentionally tank their stock
has to be the most ill informed, bean head around.. they lost
their gap up cause all the shorts covered low..lost credibility
so as to take them forever to regain it..they only sold 1.25 mil
of stock..oh yeah..certainly worth ruining their company..bunk!
IPM made a huge error..IMO would have been better to release that
the old fire assay didnt work and the new one was not perfected.
even tho repeatable..and run some more samples..stock woulda taken
a hit but not like this..
also..FWIW..if i ever do some DD on a gold stock..and i see they have hired the "world class BehreDolbear" i will run in the opposite
direction.



To: BeanCounter who wrote (29393)12/20/1997 10:27:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
M.F. is that YOU??? ? Chuck Bankes what did do say to him when you used just his INITIALS, last week. He changed his name. BC or is it MF or is it BOTH ...
Chuca
P.S.- Decipher this.



To: BeanCounter who wrote (29393)12/20/1997 12:33:00 PM
From: knight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
BeanCounter, I agree that in a lot of cases this kind manipulation
occurs, but I don't know if that was the case here? If we only knew
who was involved in the financing. Oh well.

knight