Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slowmo who wrote (873030)	7/16/2015 7:56:16 AM
From: Mongo2116	Respond to of 1583412

Wisconsin Senate Votes To Give $250 Million To Billionaires 34,526 18 Kevin Draper Filed to: MILWAUKEE BUCKS 7/15/15 9:05pm The Wisconsin Senate voted 21-10 to approve $250 million in public financing for a new arena for the Milwaukee Bucks. The bill will now be sent to the state Assembly for approval. Though the Assembly is likely to pass it, there is still some backroom negotiating and deals to be completed beforehand. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel has exhaustive detail on the compromises struck to pass the Senate version of the bill. Just a few days ago, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed a state budget that includes cuts of $250 million to the University of Wisconsin system, among other cuts to public education funding. Marc Lasry, a Bucks co-owner, is estimated by Forbes to be worth $1.87 billion, while co-owner Wesley Edens was worth $2.5 billion in 2007 before suffering a downturn (though not so big of one to prevent him from owning an NBA team) in the Great Recession. Together, they will pay just $150 million towards the arena. Proponents of the arena have cited the hoped for economic development in downtown Milwaukee as a reason to spend so much public money on it. Of course, $250 million could be used to revitalize downtown Milwaukee in plenty of other ways than paying for an arena for billionaires. Besides, the near-unanimous opinion of economists is that arenas and stadiums don’t generate enough money or spur enough job growth to justify public subsidies. Most of the jobs created are temporary construction ones, and arenas simply shift where leisure money is spent—at the arena instead of at a local movie theater or at a restaurant. The vote came one day after NBA commissioner Adam Silver claimed that a “significant” number of NBA teams were still losing money. It really is quite a brilliant racket. By crying poor the NBA claws back money from the players, and by teams threatening to move—like the Bucks did just a week ago—they blackmail cities into paying for arenas instead of for desperately needed public services. Stamping out publicly subsidized sports facilities should be easy. Those on the right don’t believe that a limited government has any business spending taxpayer dollars on non-essential services, while those on the left don’t believe in giving billionaires handouts. Instead, politicians of all stripes get bullied by sports leagues, hoodwinked by bogus economic studies, and are more concerned about voters getting angry that their favorite team is leaving than protecting their constituents from money-grubbing billionaires. It’s infuriating. __________________ SUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!