SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : NETZ - gets deal with DEC! future 100 bagger? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Harb who wrote (1490)12/20/1997 7:44:00 PM
From: DGMAC  Respond to of 1702
 
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with respect to the inner working of the MM's.

I still have not yet figured if the 100k was a buy or sell. I was even wondering if the first was a buy, and the second reversed the first, such as what would happen if it were a mistake.

What I did notice that almost all the trades were buys until 10:00 A.M., then it was quiet, then a 4000 share sell at 0.18, then quiet trading, then 200k shares in two blocks within one minute of each other. I thought MM may have been covering because the general bid/ask trend had been up for the previous hour and a half, and possibly the MM's wanted the shares in case things started to turn upward. The extra half cent on 200k shares is only $1,000, cheap insurance to pick up 200k shares on a potentially rising market.

One thing that I think we can all agree on though, is after the 200k transaction, the next 59,500 shares were all sold, and another 40,000 sold just after 12:00, another 25,000 around 1:30, and another 45,000 shares sold around 2:00 p.m. and another 72,000 beween 2:45p.m. and 4:00 p.m. By my calculations, that is about 241,000 shares at an average of .175, somebody(s) collected somewhere around $42,000 on a falling stock. It just doesn't make sense on a stock that was worth over 3 times as much a few weeks ago, and almost twice as much 2 weeks ago.

DGMAC