SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (873767)7/19/2015 3:21:43 PM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

  Respond to of 1574864
 
Keynes believed you could borrow for stimulus, but that the debt would be repaid.

Yes, borrowing in bad times and to be repaid in good high (tax) income times.
Great concept in theory.

What Keynes didn't factor in, however, was, that when 'the good times' come up and tax income flourish, then as opposed to paying back the debt, the politicians in power would rather spend that 'excess income' on new give-away projects to hang on to their power than paying back the debt.

One might say, that Mr. Keynes was rather naive, had no clue about human nature and in particular so, not about politician nature, which might not always be exactly the same as human nature but being rather even worse.

In theory, thus Keynes is great and thus prophet Krugman deserved the Nobel Prize for good intentions - but the whole scheme just - DOES NOT WORK!

/Taro



To: i-node who wrote (873767)7/23/2015 6:53:28 AM
From: RetiredNow1 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

  Respond to of 1574864
 
I know, i-node. It's why I sometimes call it neo-Keynesianism. However, most of the Keynesians on this thread are so ignorant of economics that they don't know the difference anyway. I'll bet you most on this thread have never actually read any of the books of Mises, Hayek, nor Keynes. I have.