SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (874268)7/21/2015 3:38:37 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577945
 
Scalia was part of the decision which upheld the right of individuals to bear arms, Joey.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (874268)7/21/2015 3:39:15 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577945
 
BTW, The word "militia" has several meanings. It can be a body of citizens (no longer exclusively male) enrolled for military service where full time duty is required only in emergencies. The term also refers to the eligible pool of citizens callable into military service.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (874268)7/21/2015 3:41:27 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1577945
 
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution
, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (874268)7/21/2015 3:49:53 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577945
 
BTW Joey you mischaracterized Scalia's position. Scalia does not dispute the right of individuals to keep and bear arms but he does believe that there can be narrow limitations on the right...consistent with over 200 years of similar jurisprudence which holds that no rights are absolute...even First Amendment rights. I think he also said that the 2nd Amendment would not apply to cannons, tanks, etc. Hand held weapons are clearly protected as he sees it.