Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skelly who wrote (4556)	12/21/1997 10:05:00 AM
From: George J. Tromp	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 26850

Hello Skelley: Obviously your SI ettiquette is lacking. I will respond to your question but in the future it would be appreciated to direct your inquiries here for the last time. If you believe that the last drill churned on the Gerle property., then maybe the current price is represenative of that fact. If you currently believe that it wont in the future and Gerle and Monopros are finished explaining the sources on their claims your ignornance and understanding of exploration programs is most revealing. Let me put it in a most gentle manner. Knowing the method and desire of Gerle to suceed is only mitigated by their desire to search each and every meter of their claim., much in the same manner as Winspear. The fact they are a serious explorer goes a long ways in supporting my view that the last hole hasnt been drilled on their claims. Has DeBeers announced they are pulling the plug.? No I dont think so., if there was not promise they would have long since moved on just look at Major General and the misty lake property. Didnt take much of a decision to back on out and move on. Secondly., the MPV claims and current success is no surprise., anyone having followed the story from inception knew of the prospects concerning those claims. My question of the day and maybe the MPV IR people want to publicly clarify why their claims sat idle in order for the Promoters ran the carats/ton counts to 8.4 when each successive- mini-bulk sample showed less and less. Please dont refer me to the Venture Capital Newsletter. That is an unadulturated crock., that the market didnt know how to judge diamond counts in those days. You want to know the truth.? The truth is that Aber set the standard reporting methods in the Northwest territories. After twin pipe disaster., and the fallout thereafter the dog and poney boys from MPV still promoted those cock and bull stories over the internet. Continual comparisons were made to Aber concerning the 5034. The successive min-bulk sampling occurances on 5034 more than validated the phoney PR. You see Skelley I know the story., and know it well. While MPV was boistering their 5034 discovery., Aber was quietly setting the standard of economic discoveries validated by legitimate industry standards. The venture capital analysis is quite slanted from where I sit. MPV at that time had a good idea of what the contents consisted of at 5034., and the proper reporting standards were in place following Abers discoveries. So a nice gloss over by Mr. Ballinger. Let me ask this question. Why did MPV struggle to raise exploration funds during that period.? Maybe once the market realized the hype on 5034., that the ability to raise funds sort of hit the skids.? It is no secret that MPV propertys held pipes. It has been known ever since the early Aber discoveries. If you can now understand the skepticism on my part., and its justification.? As I have stated previously., the only thing that will prove my changing of opinion concerning MPV is a detailed release of concerning gem quality and the mini-bulk sampling showing large stones as well. Frankly my friend., I dont trust the principals., plain and simple. That being said., if they prove me wrong., my deepest apologies. However the stock price should improve leading up thru the min-bulk sampling at least that has been the pattern. Regards