Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (876954)	7/31/2015 7:44:16 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1570548

"As I have posted here before, scientific evidence of AGW is essentially nonexistent." As I have posted here before, that's a total crock. "The so called "peer review" process for the journals who print most of the Warmist nonsense has been totally discredited" That's not a crock; that's a lie deniers tell themselves around the digital campfire to reassure themselves. "The "science" boils down to a public relations campaign" The science boils down to collecting data. Denial is the PR campaign, designed so that "Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the “body of fact” that exists in the mind of the general public." Message 30158028

To: i-node who wrote (876954)	7/31/2015 7:45:41 PM
From: Cautious_Optimist	1 Recommendation Recommended By zax Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570548

I guess Chevron is just a discredited group of liberal lying scientists, LOL. Also Pope Francis. A Warmest in more ways than one. And NASA. Also over 97% of scientists and credible international and US science societies in the physical sciences - chemistry, physics, geology, meteorological. The statistically valid and SIGNIFICANT measurements in the ice melt and global temperature averages are pure evidence. The other consequence including release of earthbound methane, are looming large.