Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (877873)	8/4/2015 2:58:53 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571405

Take your solid belief that Obama is a socialist. That is so far from reality it is breath-taking. I suppose you could make up a new definition of socialism to cover his positions, but rewriting the dictionary shouldn't be an acceptable way to make your point. How is it possible to solve problems with people like this who confuse reality in such a way that they don't what's up and what's down?

To: combjelly who wrote (877873)	8/4/2015 3:01:36 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1571405

which leads me to wonder why Dems elected Bush III not once, but twice!

To: combjelly who wrote (877873)	8/4/2015 3:12:21 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571405

>> Take your solid belief that Obama is a socialist. That is so far from reality it is breath-taking. I haven't called him a socialist but there is no doubt that he has pursued largely socialistic policy. While pure socialism implies some things that would require a highly competent socialist to accomplish in this country, there is no doubt, whatsoever that his policy (e.g., Obamacare, but also the executive orders as well) has moved the country toward socialism. At the same time has come unprecedented levels of cronyism -- which some are calling "crony capitalism" but there really isn't any capitalism involved. It is just a president providing policy payoffs to his buddies. Some might call it corruption.