Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (878301)	8/6/2015 1:18:40 PM
From: PKRBKR	Respond to of 1578177

“Sexually transmitted infections are costing us $16 billion a year. How are these IUDs [intrauterine devices] going to cut down on STIs? That’s what I want to know,” said Rosina Kovar, a Denver grandmother. “Are the guys going to want to use any condoms?” Seems like a reasonable argument. I don't see anything religious about it either.

To: Alighieri who wrote (878301)	8/6/2015 1:23:25 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1578177

>> I could bury you with examples... Apparently, you're confusing "blocking birth control initiatives" with "paying for birth control for those who aren't responsible enough to prioritize not getting pregnant. I can bury you with examples. It is utterly stupid to think that putting a free birth control pill stand on every street corner is going to solve the problems created by government making "having babies" a career choice.

To: Alighieri who wrote (878301)	8/6/2015 2:10:53 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1578177

These are not issues which should be publicly funded.