Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (878339)	8/6/2015 2:52:14 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583559

MY FIRST POST ON THAT THREAD: >> What is indefensible is 10% of the population earning 90% of the income and owning 90% of the wealth WHY is that indefensible? It totally makes sense. Wealth will, of course, accumulate amongst those who are best at creating it. Obviously, if that happens, wealth will quit accumulating period, and everyone loses. Bernie's alternative is for cronies to have the wealth (note that counties surrounding Washington DC are the most wealthy in the nation). METACOMET'S REPLY TO MY FIRST POST: ...how do you dress yourself? The only reasonable conclusion is that Metacomet didn't want to talk about Sanders, but wants only to hear people heap praise on Sanders. If I responded to his post in-kind, then he shouldn't be surprised. It doesn't matter. It just clearly indicates the thread is for "open-minded liberals" only.