To: TCGNJ who wrote (8273 ) 12/24/1997 4:56:00 PM From: steve goldman Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11057
I have recently been going long wdc and will continue to do so. You very rarely can find companies with such large revenues, such established and well respected management, with great profit potential (remember, they have been able to make the 1.00 per share per quarter, its not a wish, they are having pricing pressures which should resolve themselves in 12 to 18 months), trading at such a steep discount to revenues. Take the 5billion in sales and put a 1% change in margins to the bottom line. its a huge number per share. This is what you get with such an investment. I look at wdc as a great investment in a great company. Nonetheless, nothing is a gimme or a layup. Stocks go to zero. This might be one of them, but I don't think that it will happen..management is too good. YOu can't expect them to fix things in 2 months...give them 1 year to 2 years and it should be a profitable investment. If you pay 15 now and expect to get 21 by year end, look elsewhere.....the days of 4 point wdc swings are over. As far as the lawsuit, I have been following this company for quite a while. As well, I have been involved in a few lawsuits during my tenure on wall street. I can not think of a company more willing to disseminate information regarding pricing pressures and the poor business environment. This lawsuit seems quite frivolous. They have been honest and respectful of investors. What they can't do is stop the pricing pressure and bad business does not a lawsuit make. There are times, like Oxford, centennial and many others where a lawsuit is well grounded. In this case, I think it is unwarranted. Besides the company has insurance to cover this. REgards, Steve