SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cfimx who wrote (6343)12/21/1997 3:43:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
The big difference IMHO is that Netscape has no monopoly power to use in doing so, nor has it signed a consent decree as far as I know.

JMHO. No legal opinion implied.



To: cfimx who wrote (6343)12/21/1997 5:19:00 PM
From: LKO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
> I guess if you guys want to take the doj's position, then we
> MUST have Netscape stip out their newsreader, email program
> and conferenceing system from their browser. After all, other
> compnanies had stand alone products and Netscape is putting
> them out of business by incorporating them. Netscape, for shame!!!

You are confusing bundling of applications with bundling
of operating system and applications (DOJ has not complained
about a product such as Office :-))

A computer cannot function without an operating system such
as Windows95.
A computer can function fine without applications such as Word,
Browser (whatever brand) as long as there is an OS to run some
other application for the user.

The monopoly-misuse comes when an OEM is prevented from creating
an OS+application bundle or else it would be denied an operating
system. Possibly against DOJ's wishes (unless it is a punitive
action), Microsoft should be allowed to integrate Browsers in their
next base OS (Windows98) if that is what they wish as long as
someone can still install an application such as Netscape Browser.