SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (15293)12/21/1997 6:12:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24154
 
Playing with Justice is playing with fire infoworld.com

Hey, this could be a Stones theme song for DOJ. Microsoft could counter with a kinder, gentler oldie- "We are the world, We are the children . . ."

Anyway, Infoworld can always be counted on for some good comments from the ilk side over the weekend.

Whether you're right or you're wrong, flouting the spirit of the law is never a wise move. And yet, as noted in our Page One article this week by Bob Trott and Ed Scannell, Microsoft is doing just that by taking a very narrow view of a federal court order in an effort to make its case that the browser is an integral part of the operating system.

This tactic puts Microsoft's customers and partners in harm's way, and makes the Department of Justice even more determined to regulate the activities of the computer industry. The courts may not be technically savvy just yet, but history tells us these judges learn fast.


Yeah, Microsoftese is aggravating, but it's not like learning Chinese or something.

It seems to me that Microsoft could easily have sat down with the Justice Department and discussed a way of unbundling Internet Explorer without crippling Windows in the process. By failing to make that effort, Microsoft mistakenly thinks it's going to generate public support for keeping the government out the technology business. But in point of fact, these shenanigans are apt to reinforce a perception of Microsoft as a petulant bully that fails to protect the interests of its customers.

And that's why we love them so. Microsoft is giving the customers what they want! Like that 2 year old worthless Windows retail release flying off the store shelves.

So the question is, Has Microsoft lost touch with the basic precepts of jurisprudence, or is its desire to defend its inalienable right to bundle and integrate technologies worth all the negative publicity?

Is that in the Constitution, or is that another "Atlas Shrugged" thing? Bill Gates IS John Galt!

Cheers, Dan.