Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (560)	8/17/2015 12:04:14 PM
From: vette2009	Respond to of 5988

His name is stuffbug GMP....no need to start something... Your comment was fine without calling names.... Zen must start their hydrology study....they need some groundwater data... At least a years worth or maybe more so they better get their ass in gear to have a chance to make 2017

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (560)	8/17/2015 12:07:39 PM
From: stuffbug	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5988

Proof Please? My "facts" came straight from the PEA Technical Document. Where is your supporting documentation? Opinions are not facts.

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (560)

8/17/2015 1:08:31 PM

From: GrumpyGus

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
hoov
hoperrs

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5988

To: stuffbug who wrote (550)	8/17/2015 11:54:35 AM
From: GMPInvestor	Read Replies (2) of 569

That is completely false stuffbugger. Zen could theoretically be up and running in 2017. Nice try basher. I don't even need to bash Ccb it is a joke. GMP, right in the PEA, as stuffbug pointed out, in figure 20-1, RPA has an estimated timeline for permitting to BEGIN in year 3, following all the preliminary fieldwork. How you can say that ZEN could be up and mining in 2 years is unfathomable.