SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (881006)8/19/2015 12:56:41 PM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576257
 
This is well beyond Benghazi at this point.

The liberal media wouldn't cover Benghazi because they thought she was going to be the candidate.

When NYT broke the email story it was clear they had decided to take her down. I thought NYT wanted Warren, but Bernie apparently has screwed that up -- if Warren gets in now, it is going to be a fight for the far left between Bern & Warren.

So, the strategy fell apart but it does at least seem possible they did bring Clinton down. Which is good news anyway you look at it.



To: tejek who wrote (881006)8/19/2015 1:13:50 PM
From: one_less5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bill
D.Austin
DMaA
locogringo
POKERSAM

  Respond to of 1576257
 
It is long over due tejek. You can go back as far as her service on the legal team that took Nixon out. She was fired from that team for being a liar who could ruin their case because of it. What has she accomplished since? She is good at positioning her self as a left wing champion of women and minorities but she has never done anything more than pad her own bank account while riding on other people's coat tails. She is a self serving incompetent fraud and for the first time the public is looking at what is under her veil of deceit.



To: tejek who wrote (881006)8/19/2015 1:31:10 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation

Recommended By
PKRBKR

  Respond to of 1576257
 
LOL.

Let's have another bubble and crash.

We'll turn even more homeowners into renters.
___

U.S. housing regulator targets more support for poor borrowers


16 minutes ago


.View photo

Single family homes for sale are seen in San Marcos, California October 25, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Blake

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The regulator for U.S. housing finance giants Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) told the two firms on Wednesday to provide more support to low-income Americans taking out mortgages and refinancing home loans.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency released goals for the two government-controlled firms for 2015-2017 that would advance agency chief Mel Watt's aim to widen access to housing credit.

The rules direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to expand the number of loans they back for low-income families to 24 percent of the their purchases of single-family home mortgages over the period, up from a target of 23 percent in 2014.

FHFA also asked each firm to make mortgages refinanced by low-income families a bigger share of their refinancing purchases, and to increase the number of mortgages they buy for multi-family properties each year.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been controlled by the U.S. government since taxpayers bailed them out in 2008 during the housing market implosion.

The two firms don't lend money directly, but buy mortgages from lenders and sell them as packaged securities with a government guarantee. They back most new U.S. mortgages, and their purchases are a major driver of credit access.

Boosting support for low-income borrowers, however, could stir controversy in the U.S. Congress. Many Republican lawmakers think Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac contributed to the housing bubble and 2007-2009 financial crisis with policies aimed at supporting mortgage access for the poor.

(Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Paul Simao)



To: tejek who wrote (881006)8/19/2015 4:48:04 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 1576257
 
You wanted Brown to be President? What kind of closet nazi are you?
How would you feel it is was your house getting seized?

+++



Aug 17, 7:18 PM EDT

RECORDS: CALIFORNIA PLANS TAKING LAND FOR HUGE WATER TUNNELS

BY ELLEN KNICKMEYER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER




SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- State contractors have readied plans to acquire as many as 300 farms in the California delta by eminent domain to make room for a pair of massive, still-unapproved water tunnels proposed by Gov. Jerry Brown, according to documents obtained by opponents of the tunnels.

Farmers whose parcels were listed and mapped in the 160-page property-acquisition plan expressed dismay at the advanced planning for the project, which would build 30-mile-long tunnels in the delta formed by the San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers.

"What really shocks is we're fighting this and we're hoping to win," said Richard Elliot, who grows cherries, pears and other crops on delta land farmed by his family since the 1860s. "To find out they're sitting in a room figuring out this eminent domain makes it sound like they're going to bully us ... and take what they want."

Officials involved in the project defended planning so far ahead regarding the tunnels.

"Planning for right-of-way needs, that is the key part of your normal planning process," said Roger Patterson, assistant general manager for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, one of the water agencies that would benefit from the twin tunnels.

The district serves 17 million people in Southern California as well as large farms and businesses.

Brown's administration said re-engineering water flows of the delta - the largest estuary on the West Coast - is essential to undoing mistakes of past water projects and to supplying water to Southern California.

Brown has pushed for a massive delta makeover since his first stint as governor in the 1970s and 1980s. In May, he told critics of the tunnels to "shut up."

Opponents say the tunnels would jeopardize delta farming and destroy vital wildlife habitat.

"If these reports are correct, then we have further confirmation that the tunnels project has been a forgone conclusion," state Sen. Lois Wolk, D-Davis, who chairs a committee on the delta, said in an email Monday.

The environmental review, "which should be used to choose a project, is simply being used to justify the favored project," she wrote.

Through October, the project officially is in a period of public comment on the environmental impact of the tunnels. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which opposed an earlier version of the project, also must still weigh in.

Restore the Delta, a group of farmers, fishing associations, environmental groups and other opponents, released the property plan that was obtained with a request made under the state open records law. The plan targets public and private land in Sacramento, San Joaquin, Contra Costa and Alameda counties to be acquired for the project.

Under the plan, landowners would have 30 days to consider and negotiate a one-time state offer, while officials simultaneously prepare to take the land by forced sale if owners declined to sell. "Negotiations to continue in parallel with eminent domain proceedings," the plan notes.

Contractors also appear to call for minimal public input.

"All transactions are conducted, reviewed and approved internally by DCE staff and managers to maintain control and avoid unnecessary delays to schedule," the property plan outlines. "DCE shall seek to minimize external review and approval requirements."

DCE is short for Delta Conveyance Facilities Design and Construction Enterprise, a private-contractor group embedded within the state Department of Water Resources to work on the proposed tunnels.

In a June interview, Neil Gould, an attorney for the Department of Water Resources, said planning for the proposed tunnels was no more than 10 percent complete and had focused on assessing the environmental impact.

Asked if planning the process of eminent domain was warranted as part of the project's environmental review, Department of Water Resources spokeswoman Nancy Vogel said Monday in an email, "identification of properties that may be within the project area is necessary ... as DWR needs to estimate the proposed project's potential impacts to those properties."

Public water agencies paid for the property acquisition plan, Vogel said. Those include water agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area and Central California, as well as Southern California, she said.

Patterson, with the Metropolitan Water District, said the latest revisions to the overall tunnels project laid out using more public land and less private land.

Osha Meserve, an attorney for some of the delta farmers fighting the project, said the latest plans still proposes taking roughly the same land as before.

© 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.