Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Hurst who wrote (4224)	8/19/2015 4:55:13 PM
From: J.B.C.	2 Recommendations Recommended By Jorj X Mckie Sdgla Respond to of 4326

The heat index has existed for all of 37 years. You and Thomas L Brain-Fried-Man have no idea if this is the most extreme reading ever. Is your brain fried as well? Do you possibly think at all before you post? en.wikipedia.org

To: Don Hurst who wrote (4224)	8/19/2015 4:56:56 PM
From: weatherguru	2 Recommendations Recommended By J.B.C. TideGlider Respond to of 4326

You bet, here's a map. The reading was at an airport in Iran. If it's valid, it's micrometeorological and not synoptic. What's wrong with questioning observations? Meteorologists at Weather Underground do it: wunderground.com wunderground.com Melbourne, FL had dew point of 91F in 1987. It's in the book "Extreme Weather & Climate".

To: Don Hurst who wrote (4224)	8/21/2015 4:08:22 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 4326

LOL!!! Friedman can do so much better... but, apparently, he wanted a day off... and knew the people he works for are major suckers for anything addressing "climate" as a subject, particularly if pairing pseudo "proofs" with advocacy that takes extremes in error and claims it proves climate is something that we "need to do something about". The only thing I note the article exposes... is how easily manipulated the climate fraudsters are... and how overly willing they are to pay through the nose to be told what they want to hear.

To: Don Hurst who wrote (4224)	8/29/2015 11:32:02 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Recommended By nicewatch Respond to of 4326

I do not think Trump would make a good president. But if he supports the vast majority of Climate Scientists, not the 1or 2% who support AGW, there is really no issue. Those who are too stupid to understand the charts and and real science explanations behind them only seem to be able to argue. Watts Up baloney somehow identifies deniers. I do not know what is being denied. There is no science that defines any sensitivity of global temperature cooling rates with the trace gas CO2 in the atmosphere. Overnight in Monroe CT the low was 57 degrees and for August that is not warming. Now as to the Mann hockey stick fabrication, it has been shown false and only a denier cannot admit this.