Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184232)	8/20/2015 4:44:39 PM
From: weatherguru	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224864

I'm pointing out that NOAA/NCDC 'global' temperature is just a fudged measurement. Satellite data show that NOAA/NCDC fudged measurement is just for headlines. It's not a record El Nino. It's not the hottest ever measured. Wow. You've regressed from 'certainty' to 'persuaded by preponderance of the evidence'. LOL! I'm getting to you :) Here's something for you to think about. If CO2-based warming is a certainty, then why is there not a tropospheric hot spot in the tropics? Go ahead and look it up. 100% of the climate models show a 'tropospheric hot spot in the tropics' as a result of CO2-forced warming. They have to: it's the only way to create a positive feedback of CO2-based warming, yet one is not observed and hasn't been observed over the past 30+ years. This implies two options: 1. CO2-based warming is a sham, or 2. natural feedbacks offset CO2-based warming.