Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : What Works on Wall Street (O'Shaugnessy) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mitchell Scott who wrote (62)	12/27/1997 5:29:00 PM
From: Paul Senior	Respond to of 109

Mitchell Scott: Yes, still following. His method calls for rebalancing portfolio every year (at this time I believe). It will be interesting to see what his screens indicate for '98. If you believe in the methodology, why would you want to add another factor? If you don't believe in the methodology, why would you pick US industrial outlook gov't numbers as a proxy for expected growth industries which in turn I assume is a proxy for growth stocks which in turn, leads to specific stocks which will go up in value. Lots of top down thinking and presumptions to drive to down to finally selecting a stock IMO. Too many presumptions. Paul Senior

To: Mitchell Scott who wrote (62)	12/27/1997 11:17:00 PM
From: Scott Mc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 109

Mitchell, Royal Bank in Canada has just lauched a couple of funds based on low P/Sr stocks and certain other criteria using O'Sh's stock picking abilitity and David Chilton(The Wealthy Barber) as their spokesman. I keep trying to get around to putting a few K into the funds just to get the propectus and be on the mailing list. Scott PS: Im in Canada and have an acct with Royal Bank so it would be very easy for me to pick up this no load fund, might not be as simple for you..