Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (882277)	8/24/2015 7:27:40 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574269

I'm not going to dissect the document but from the various summaries I've read some provisions last five years, 10, 15, and some 20. It is claimed some are perpetual but obviously, it becomes difficult or impossible to enforce a provision like that. Obama said of the agreement, that "Iran will not be able to use its advanced centrifuges to produce enriched Uranium for the next decade (10 years, last I checked)." What do you make of that in the context of the following: a) If they can get by ten years without enriching, why can't they get by indefinitely without it? b) If it is to our advantage for them to not enrich for 10 years, why is the advantage not greater for 20 years?