SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184384)8/25/2015 7:11:19 PM
From: Jack of All Trades4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
TideGlider
weatherguru

  Respond to of 224759
 
Bullshit, data is based on 200 year smoothing avg using "adjusted" NOAA data...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184384)8/26/2015 7:03:34 AM
From: longnshort5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
lorne
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224759
 
Black Activists in Detroit Blame Democrats for Violence – Red Statements

Black activists got angry when the Detroit Police Chief James Craig called the people responsible for shooting 12 people on a playground killing one of them urban terrorists. They complained about the insult and want him to apologize. Craig refused to back down and stuck to his guns.

Craig said quite bluntly:

“You will allow this to continue if you do nothing. It must stop now.”

That’s when the president of the Detroit National Action Network (founded by Al Sharpton) Rev. Charles Williams took umbrage to Craig’s assertions that these thugs are urban terrorists:

“We want to make it very much known that the young people who are causing the violence in our community are not terrorists,” the activists said. “They are not urban terrorists, they are the products of bad urban policy.”

It’s good to see them put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the ones truly responsible for running the city into the ground, the democrats who have ruled Detroit for the past 50 plus years.

I doubt they understood that was what they were actually saying.

In their minds (or what passes for such) they were probably thinking along the lines of “bad Bush urban policy.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184384)8/26/2015 10:05:15 AM
From: weatherguru3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider
tonto

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
I asked for proof of fires being caused by CO2. This is just silly. 20 degree rise per century! That's entertaining. No matter the bogus/fabricated number, to project climate trends across a century based on one-year is the stupidest thing one can do. Whoever wrote that is dumb as shit.

Here's a very simple question Kenny. What is the infrared feedback from all 400 ppm of CO2? No feedbacks...just CO2. I'll take BTU's or Watts per meter-squared.

Follow-up: Projecting the temperature trend from 1997 to 1998, that rise was 100C per century. Why is it not 18C warmer already?




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184384)8/29/2015 3:05:10 PM
From: Jack of All Trades2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Joe Bastradi's updated winter forecast, Kenny you will be warmer and drier... I guess you'll be harping on that all winter...

weatherbell.com