SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184536)8/31/2015 12:24:10 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Do huge storms in the Pacific push the Jet Stream north?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184536)8/31/2015 12:24:20 PM
From: weatherguru4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
lorne
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224759
 
Volcanoes were more active during the dinosaur era. Was it cooler then? Soot precipitates out the air rather quickly unless it penetrates the stratosphere, while the massive amounts of CO2 and methane emitted by volcano linger for years. None of it matters, since CO2 beyond 250 ppm doesn't really do anything. It's logarithmic...the IPCC says so.

Look at they bottom of the page in the link below, it shows the change in forcing associated with CO2 is a logarithmic (base-e) function. Of course, the coefficients decrease with every release of the IPCC...which show that the climate sensitivity published by Lindzen and Choi in 2009 is correct and verifies the plot below.

grida.no




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184536)8/31/2015 12:35:47 PM
From: weatherguru1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224759
 
One more thing to consider Kenny. 75% of the Earth is covered with water. Do eruptions and lava flow from underwater hydrothermal vents cool, too? Do they impact the oceans? Do oceans impact the climate?

pmel.noaa.gov



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184536)8/31/2015 1:23:31 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Kenny, Is it true that Hillary was sunning herself near the waters edge at a well known beach and a group of kind people tried to roll her back into the water?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184536)8/31/2015 2:02:04 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Let’s face it… the only winners from Obamacare were the insurance companies

POSTED AT 12:41 PM ON AUGUST 31, 2015 BY JAZZ SHAW
hotair.com

Last week Ed talked about the large, looming spikes in health insurance premiums which are coming our way. For anyone who has been paying attention since roughly 2008 this really shouldn’t be any sort of surprise. We had plenty of warning from conservative critics and it was at least suggestively supported by Democrats who kept changing their story on what the Affordable Care Act was really supposed to do. Originally it was going to lower rates. Then it was going to keep them roughly the same. Then the Democrats admitted that the rates would go up, but they would go up more slowly than they would if we never passed the legislation. (But hey… we had to pass it to find out what was in it, so I suppose all’s fair in love and legislative war.)

But there’s a bit more to the story here than is reflected in just the premium increases. Somebody has been taken for a ride and I’ll leave it up to you to decide whether or not you came out on the losing end. But there was certainly one set of winners in all of this. As David Williams pointed out at The Daily Caller last week, the biggest insurance companies have been doing a victory lap.
Meanwhile, as Americans are suffering from rising costs and less access to quality health care, the biggest winners from the passage of Obamacare are the insurance giants. In the aftermath of the government health care takeover, there has been an explosion of health insurance company profits, windfalls and megamergers. As “stock market darlings,” health insurance company profits have skyrocketed to all-time highs and stocks have split even thanks to the health care law.
Reports show the so-called “Big Five” health insurers – UnitedHealth, Aetna, Cigna, Humana, and Anthem – have all outperformed the broader stock market by a wide margin since Obamacare was signed into law in March 2010. That’s why America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s main trade group, filed an amicus brief to defend the Obama administration in the recent Supreme Court case, King v. Burwell. And when the law was upheld, it was no surprise that there was a boost in health insurance company stocks.
What’s really curious is how the President can remain in full blown denial mode after all this time. Is it just political positioning or does Barack Obama honestly think this is how we wanted things to work out? (Wall Street Journal)
“My expectation is that they’ll come in significantly lower than what’s being requested,” he said, saying Tennesseans had to work to ensure the state’s insurance commissioner “does their job in not just passively reviewing the rates, but really asking, ‘OK, what is it that you are looking for here? Why would you need very high premiums?’”
I expect politicking from politicians since it’s sort of baked into the cake. If the President is just trying to cover his backside and paint a happy face on things, I may disagree with him and accuse him of being disingenuous, but realize that he’s just doing what politicians do. But when you hear him saying things like why would you need very high premiums I have to wonder if he’s actually out of touch with reality. The insurance industry is precisely that… an industry. It’s a collection of businesses in a capitalist system and they will charge precisely as much as they can get away with charging to maximize their profits just as any other business would.

At the same time, the federal government is doing nothing to address the other side of the scale in terms of costs. One of the key factors in keeping costs down was always going to be increased competition, including allowing companies to freely compete across state lines. Conservatives warned about the need for this all through the Obamacare battle and they were ignored. And yet we are still in the midst of an era of incredible consolidation as more and more large providers merge. Anthem is trying to absorb Cigna and Aetna is looking to take over Humana. If these go through, the number of major providers in the United States will be less than a handful.

If you ignore things like this you have no standing to claim to understand the scope of the cost problem and you forfeit the right to act surprised when rates unexpectedly keep going up. Unless, of course, you are just completely in denial.