Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (883913)	8/31/2015 10:03:21 PM
From: combjelly	2 Recommendations Recommended By tejek zax Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 1576642

Again, State claims the information was not classified at the time. Which implies that they were classified at a later time. But we cannot prove she did not know there was confidential information in them or we could hold her liable. Another one of your word games. 'Confidential' is a classification. One step below 'Top Secret'. The information in the emails was not classified 'confidential' at the time the emails were sent. At least according to the State Department. Logically speaking, that means they were classified 'confidential' at some later point in time by another department. Short of a time machine, there was no way she could have known that the information would be later classified. Period. End of game.