Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (884314)	9/1/2015 7:14:00 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1578198

Hungary shuts down rail traffic... Chaos at Budapest Station... Farage warns EU faces crisis of biblical proportions... Czech President Calls for Army to Defend Border... Murder of elderly couple in Sicily fuels Italy's growing anti-immigrant sentiment... ISIS Caught Crossing Into Europe Posing As Refugees...

To: i-node who wrote (884314)	9/2/2015 12:23:32 PM
From: Alighieri	2 Recommendations Recommended By gronieel2 tejek Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578198

There is no credible science to show, or even suggest, that homosexuality is anything other than a choice. LOL...sure there is...Carson's science of "people who go to prison straight and come back gay"...very scientific ...hard to believe that this man is actually a "man of science". It's also more likely for two identical twins, who share all of their genes, to both be gay than it is for two fraternal twins, who share just half of their genes, to both be homosexual. Those studies also suggest that genes seemed to have a greater influence on the sexual orientation of male versus female identical twins. livescience.com Al

To: i-node who wrote (884314)	9/2/2015 4:21:58 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578198

Except for the fact you didn't prove me wrong,, I suppose you have a point. And you never provided any proof that it was choice, you just attacked the evidence that it is genetics. Then you claimed that if it wasn't genetics, it must be a choice. Which isn't true. All you do is handwave on the subject. And make unfounded claims.