To: POKERSAM who wrote (884718 ) 9/3/2015 11:54:23 AM From: Wharf Rat Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576179 "Even if true, which it is not," It is. " you could prove it, which you can not," Oh, it's all been proven. Deniers don't accept the proof, and prolly never will. "now you are turning it into a religion. " No, it's still a science. "What could be a bigger cause than saving the planet ?" Saving a livable biosphere for our children's children's children.. The planet will carry on, even if we cook ourselves. It isn't the first time we've used science to "save" ourselves.. "You have only made up science to support it " No; the denial industry has made up non-science to sell doubt.The science is real enuf. "You also have total disgust for non believers" They tend to be chimps who came down from the trees about 3 weeks after the rest of us discovered fire. Those among them who hold political power in the US have put future generations of humanity at risk because of they have been bought off by the people who sell carbon. May 17 2015.. The Guardian........Royal Dutch Shell has been accused of pursuing a strategy that would lead to potentially catastrophic climate change after an internal document acknowledged a global temperature rise of 4C, twice the level considered safe for the planet. A paper used for guiding future business planning at the Anglo-Dutch multinational assumes that carbon dioxide emissions will fail to limit temperature increases to 2C, the internationally agreed threshold to prevent widespread flooding, famine and desertification. Instead, the New Lens Scenarios document refers to a forecast by the independent International Energy Agency (IEA) that points to a temperature rise of up to 4C in the short term, rising later to 6C