Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (8)	9/4/2015 12:31:09 PM
From: helo4	1 Recommendation Recommended By Luvin_It Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 537

Good morning NC... The subject matter is the participation of company officials participating on public or private BB. The issue of company officials participating on BB is mentioned in section 6.12 of the National policy 51-201 disclosure standards document, amended May 31, 2013.What would be your position on company officials participating in public or private BB?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (8)	9/4/2015 1:34:47 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Respond to of 537

Message #8 from NuclearCrystals at 9/4/2015 12:20:37 PM Helo4, what would you consider is the difference between a company official discussing a project with an investor over the phone or in person at an AGM or other such investor/company gathering in comparison to a company official participating through any form of social media (including investor forums) ? Do you consider "best practice" guidelines apply equally to both or do you think one has greater restriction than the other? Bob, the issue here is that CEO Duncan contravened NATIONAL POLICY 51-201 guidelines by posting on a public forum. Not only did he contravene the guidelines, he broke the rules of common sense too. Stop trying to divert the discussion by introducing a different issue. Stay on topic Bob.