Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoov who wrote (13)	9/4/2015 1:00:46 PM
From: Luvin_It	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 537

That is a complete argument from ignorance, an informal fallacy. You should know better.

To: hoov who wrote (13)	9/4/2015 1:53:07 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 537

Yes any company official could conceivably disclose non-public material information, anywhere, any time, by any means and they would be contravening the guidelines. It's an honour system. If somebody is not honourable then no guideline is going to stop that activity. Hoov do you approve of the comments CEO Duncan made on Stockhouse in late 2013? Of course you don't approve but you will now go to great lengths to avoid saying so.

To: hoov who wrote (13)	9/4/2015 8:46:31 PM
From: Glazeddonut	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 537

Hmmm hoov are you sure when you say "always" I know from a quick glance on sh that is not true.second post I took a look at June 22 there was no indication whom the poster was on stockhouse.Yes the next ten I glanced out were as you say identified.Your term "always " just got blown apart.As for you "hoov" if I go to the phone book or google this I will see a picture of you.Truly another moronicic statement.You need to sign your full name including job description to make that comment stick.Lar Hoov 99% readers here have ZERO if any idea who the real person is behind that avatar.Try again......."always" NOT