SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 12:18:51 PM
From: TopCat2 Recommendations

Recommended By
rayrohn
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224755
 
>>>If she want not aware of it, there is no crime.

You're a lawyer? Did you even get out of grade school?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 12:23:20 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
comrade Philips..."Did Clinton knowingly keep top secret information on her computer? If she want not aware of it, there is no crime."....

Are you saying that the hildabeast is so stupid that she could not tell the difference between Top Secret and idle chit chat?? Is so I agree she is a dumb as a fence post and as such dangerous to America.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 12:31:03 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Respond to of 224755
 
Be afraid comrade, be very afraid...




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 12:45:51 PM
From: tonto1 Recommendation

Recommended By
lorne

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
What would be a possible excuse for an email pertaining to North Korea's nuclear weapons? Foreign intelligence.................nuclear weapons... ............hmmm

She was briefed on classified information. I cannot believe that Nuclear Weapons were not covered...but if she can make that one fly...! (s)

She was designated as one capable of classifying information, she would have to have had training.

2009 State Dept. Document: Hillary Clinton Trained in ‘Safe Handling’ of Classified Information Kristinn Taylor Aug 19th, 2015 9:29 pm

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was trained in the proper handling of classified information by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security according to the Diplomatic Security 2009 Year in Review booklet the bureau posted online.


Screen image via Mediaite.

Under the heading “Safe Handling of Information” on page 21 the bureau boasted of its efforts to quickly bring new Obama administration appointees up to speed on security issues.

“DS also provides new Department of State employees with training in the proper handling of sensitive and classified information.

“DS contributed to the smooth transition of U.S. government officials by providing more than 180 members of the new Obama administration–ranging from Secretary Clinton to various ambassadors and other presidential appointees–with security training, and immediate access to highly classified systems and other information products critical to their new roles.

“In 2009, DS delivered information security educational briefings to nearly 6,000 State Department employees, contractors and personnel from other government agencies.”

As The Gateway Pundit reported last week, Clinton was one of a select few high ranking government officials granted by President Barack Obama with the authority and responsibility to classify information on sight as ‘top secret’ or ‘secret’, known as “Original Classification Authority.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 1:02:05 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
lorne

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
LOLOL!!!!! Of course she was aware of the material being classified, she was the top official at the State Department and in that role she was one of the few who was actually responsible for assigning the various classifications of the material in the first place... and since ALL classified material is classified AT BIRTH, she obviously knew what she was doing...

Have you no shame??? Why are you still here??? LOL!!!

Besides, didn't you know that IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE!!!

According to your demented logic, if someone didn't know that murder was a crime and he murdered someone, then there would be no crime??? This is beyond absurd on its face...

Where did you get your alleged law degree, out of a Cracker Jack box???

GZ



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 1:02:23 PM
From: Jack of All Trades2 Recommendations

Recommended By
lorne
TideGlider

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224755
 
She had to go to classes annually to determine what was considered classified information or not.

So your argument about it being marked classified or not is moot.

Do you not comprehend the issue here?

Whether it was marked classified or not is NOT the issue. IF she opened a classified email and read it she should have known whether it would have been classified or not based on her expertise required of someone being Secretary of State.

What you are conveying is that she didn't have the qualifications to be SoS because she was too stupid to what was considered to be Classified information.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (184786)9/8/2015 2:14:15 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
Wrong Kenneth. If it was on her personal server she is guilty.