Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (886705)	9/10/2015 7:46:20 PM
From: work4ever	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574002

Has it been shown that she improperly handled classified materials? So far there is no evidence she did. There have been some claims that happened, but they don't seem to be backed by any proof that it was classified at the time she handled it. I know Fox has been trying to make the case, but It has been reported (obviously I have no inside information) that she had on her private server intelligence that could only be derived from USA spy satellites. This would be one of the two messages that the IGs said should be classified TS. It is actually classified beyond TS, with the TK (Talent Keyhole) caveat. Such intelligence originates from one of two agencies: NRO or NGA. It is classified (and marked) on origination. It would never leave either of those agencies without being properly classified and marked. If you will admit that you don't give a damn what she did, and will vote for any nominee with a D after their name, I will chase down some links for you. Otherwise, you're on your own.

To: combjelly who wrote (886705)	9/10/2015 10:03:45 PM
From: TopCat	Respond to of 1574002

>>> a) Fox doesn't have the actual information Nor do you.