Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (1207)	9/11/2015 11:05:58 PM
From: John	Respond to of 73584

Yes, yes, but you were replying to a post that I made where I clearly differentiated "Latinos for Obama" as a central point in my post, so it didn't make sense for you to respond by arguing against my point, while grouping non-Hispanic Whites with Hispanic Whites in an effort to give more weight to your own point. My current point is that non-White Hispanics aren't nearly the majority that you asserted in your response, the demographic survey from 2014 supports that point.

To: zax who wrote (1207)	9/11/2015 11:15:12 PM
From: John	1 Recommendation Recommended By GROUND ZERO™ Respond to of 73584

zax wrote: "Whites", not "non-Hispanic whites" was the original statement. Splitting hairs here, still a majority. Again, your context didn't make sense because you were responding to very specific points that I made about Latinos for Obama, and you attempted to counter those points by intimating an unfair advantage of the White majority, and you embellished that point by including Hispanics in the White majority, despite the fact my original post clearly differentiated the two. So, no, it is certainly not "splitting hairs".