SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (887243)9/12/2015 4:08:18 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bonefish

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575431
 
The issue with the aquifer was reasonable dealt with, and was to an extent a pretext anyway. He opposed it because certain parts of his base opposed it strongly.

Obama delayed new drilling for a long time in the gulf, and presided over many other delays in drilling (now always as a matter of policy, sometimes it was just poor performance by the bureaucracy, but that's still poor performance by the administration, and is esp. relevant if he's trying to claim credit for lower oil prices, or other people are trying to give him credit) and when the house Republicans passed bills to speed things up, which rejected in the senate he did nothing to get things back on track) He opposed a route for the output of the drilling in Canada. For some time he stopped approval of new drilling in the arctic outside ANWR, eventually reversing much of that, but it had an impact. He opposed developing ANWR.

Much more here
naturalresources.house.gov



To: tejek who wrote (887243)9/12/2015 4:46:29 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575431
 
"Denying Keystone will not decrease energy production"

Denying Keystone is meant to keep some tar sands carbon in the ground. Will that decrease energy production? Not if we produce green energy to replace it.

Keystone XL essential for tar sands development

physicsandsocietybc.wordpress.com