To: TEDennis who wrote (1642 ) 12/22/1997 2:29:00 PM From: tech Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3391
TED, sounds like you need to sell you shares of CSGI and buy shares in a company who uses a manual conversion process or terms that are more to you liking. I find if so humorous that you own shares in CSGI, but yet you don't believe in their technology. Good thing you doubled your position. <gg> Now to CHASE Here is what they say: The reality of the problem is now becoming apparent within Europe, and we believe that the entry time is fast running out.'' Shipton explained: ''We have reviewed many of the leading industry approaches , and in our opinion the ConSyGen 2000 automated approach, coupled with CADAS, clearly demonstrates itself as one of the most complete and effective solutions available , offering our clients an error-free and efficient way of eliminating and testing Year 2000 problem whilst meeting aggressive customer timing deadlines.'' I have to admit I am a little surprised to see a smart guy like you nit pick over the use of a term and not look at the big picture. In a post I made a few days ago, I stated that more and more year 2000 companies will have to turn to the automated conversion houses such as ConSyGen. Using tools from PTUS, SEEC, VIAS, etc... will not be a viable solution once the flood gates open. Seems like CHASE is smart enough to know the difference between a company that has automated assisted tool and one that has a fully-automated conversion. We should see more alliances come forth and companies like KEA who wrap their services around the automated tools, will also have to turn to the automated conversion houses. ConSyGen has done many pilots, some for Fortune 100 companies like Motorola, and as we start to move into Q1 and Q2 of 1998 we should these companies start to award contracts. (remember, budgeting in Q3 and Q4 of 1997 to start spending in Q1 and Q2 of 1998) YOU WILL SEE IT HAPPEN. Stay tuned.... and I will be buying the last week in Dec.