Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nittany Lion who wrote (5858)	12/22/1997 4:04:00 PM
From: Brian	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

Can you believe BNGO closed UP!!! last: 5 1/4 +1/32 bid: 5 3/16 ask: 5 5/16 vol: 160,900

To: Nittany Lion who wrote (5858)	12/22/1997 4:21:00 PM
From: Jay D.	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 10368

I was just wondering, has anyone considered whether Rodney could have been paid by BNGO to pump the warrents in order to get them to their exercise price? He was overly bullish on the earnings as well as the warrent call, he even proposed to hold on to the warrents to the last day of the call? Looking at other warrent calls this seems foolish and one should get out as soon as word gets out of the impending call, which we would have had plenty of time to do had I known the effect of warrent calls. Rodney however was bullish and advised to stay put which given his credability at the time I assumed was good advise. This may have been good advise for the company but not any warrent holders! It kept the warrent call from collapsing totally because so many of us didn't bail out! But I would dare say anyone in the same situation again with a small cap as this would bail at first word of a warrent call! Rodney has mysteriously disappeared now also which doesn't help his credability either. Jay