Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsnow who wrote (4639)	12/22/1997 4:41:00 PM
From: Bucky Katt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116815

GS-- I submit that if they had waited, they could have gotten the co. for at least 1/3 less. No one was lining up to buy Plutonic. This was not like the fight for Santa Fe gold. However, since they are using shares as currency, who cares? Maybe they (HM) know their own shares are way overvalued, so they figured, hey, what the hell. Maybe we will have the opportunity to buy HM at 5 bucks. ""Plutonic is one of Australia's leading gold producers, but its share price has tumbled from above A$7.50 in mid-1996 to A$1.95 recently before closing on Friday at A$2.80. A trading halt was applied to Plutonic shares on Monday. Plutonic's results slumped to a net loss of A$63.06 million in the first half of calendar 1997, following a severe write-down in the carrying value of its mines. Plutonic chairman Paul McClintock said the deal was supported by the company's 34 percent shareholder Malaysia Mining Corp Bhd (MMCB.KL), which has two representatives on the Plutonic board.""

To: goldsnow who wrote (4639)	12/23/1997 7:18:00 PM
From: goldsnow	Respond to of 116815

"The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has requested that South Korea introduce layoffs immediately and lift all restrictions on foreign exchange, South Korean newspapers reported on Wednesday." biz.yahoo.com