Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (890276)	9/26/2015 8:48:57 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Respond to of 1574737

I guess if it's not in the bible, it doesn't count...........

To: combjelly who wrote (890276)	9/27/2015 12:46:38 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574737

>> It is wingnut gospel that scientists are incompetent. The problem with climate scientists is only the incompetent one gets heard. The truly brilliant among them -- who have challenged the bogus claims -- are considered to be the wack jobs. There are climate scientists who go where the science takes them. And there are some (like Mann, and others in his group) who have created bogus science in an effort to further their careers. I would encourage you to look at the work of Richard Lindzen, Willie Soon, and of course, Steve McIntyre (and Ross McKitrick). These people understand more about the true science of climate change than the other guys do. Most seriously you should consider some of the criticisms of the various IPCC "findings" and the absolute fraud of the peer review process as documented by some of the above and summarized by A. W. Montfort. If you would take half the energy you spend giving lip service to the lie and use it to actually question the science you would develop a true understanding of the issues. It is not complicated and it certainly worth doing if you want to have any credibility at all. I have always doubted the science but was open minded about it until I started actually reading the articles and understanding the statistics. It quickly became abundantly clear that the evidence is not that to support the claims as of this time.